Wednesday, January 22, 2014

Mtgox spreads up to 1% / Silk Road Involved?

Do you want to share?

Do you like this story?

Redditor cardevitoraphricticia recently pointed out that the spreads on Mtgox are up to 1%.  That means that in addition to any other fees incurred the transaction participants are each paying some % of a 1% spread when they trade, a fairly expensive processing cost given Bitcoin’s fairly fluid nature.  He goes on to hypothesize that this means that the high frequency traders who were stabilizing the markets may be backing off.  This could mean two things opportunity (for those who want to step into their place) or risk (if there are happenings a going on that the general public is not aware of).  For example, Mtgox does have a press release on their own website discounting their involvement with the Silk Road.


The Reddit thread has a lot of other speculation on what is causing the rift in prices but the movement in itself is a powerful reminder of the valuable role that market makers play in price efficiency.   



Find out about...

Bitcoin (82) Infographic (30) Bitcion (26) Governments (18) 101 (14) Alts (13) Legal (12) Cryptocurrencies (11) Trading (10) Litecoin (9) MtGox (9) Startup (9) Cryptsy (8) Banking (6) China (6) Dogecoin (6) History (6) Investing (5) Mining (5) Value (5) Video (5) CoinBase (4) SIlkroad (4) Taxes (4) BitInstant (3) BitPay (3) Bitcoins (3) CNN (3) Canada (3) Charles Shrem (3) Economics (3) Inforgraphic (3) Mega (3) Miner (3) Money Transfer (3) Secondmarket (3) Taxation (3) Twitter (3) ASIC (2) Analytics (2) Bitstamp (2) Block Chain (2) Crashes (2) Gold (2) Hacking (2) Kim Dot Com (2) Kraples (2) Max Keiser (2) MaxCoin (2) Media (2) MegaCoin (2) Miners (2) Peercoin (2) RonPaulCoin (2) Technical (2) TigerDirect (2) Where (2) Winklevoss (2) bitcoins (2) 2014 (1) 42 (1) AMA (1) ASX (1) ATM (1) Academia (1) Amazon (1) Analyst Report (1) Andreessen Horowitz (1) Android (1) Australia (1) Avalon ASIC (1) BITFINEX (1) BTC-e (1) BTCE (1) BTCEX (1) BTCKing (1) BTX (1) Barter (1) BattleCoin (1) Berenberg (1) Bitcoin Days (1) Bitcoin as Commodity (1) Blockchain (1) Blockchain.info (1) Bloomberg (1) Bobby Lee (1) Books (1) Central Banks (1) CoinTerra (1) Coinye (1) Coinye West (1) Credit Cards (1) Denmarl. Bitcoin (1) Detroit (1) Dollar (1) El-Erian (1) Elliott Management (1) Encryption (1) Europe (1) Exhanges (1) FaceBook (1) Feathercoin (1) FinCen (1) Finland (1) Forex (1) Fred Ehrsam (1) Fun (1) Funding (1) Goldman (1) Greenbank (1) Hashtag (1) Heineken (1) Helsinki (1) Hoarder metrics (1) Igor (1) Investigation (1) JPMorgan (1) Japan (1) Jet (1) Kayne (1) Landscape (1) Las Vegas (1) Li Ka-shing (1) Linux (1) Liquidity (1) Local Bitcoins (1) MAS (1) Mac (1) Markets (1) Masses (1) Matrix (1) Mexico (1) Michigan (1) Millennials (1) Mint (1) MoonCoin (1) Namecoin (1) Neo (1) New York (1) Novacoin (1) OS (1) Online Wallet (1) OpenSourceCoin (1) Options (1) Overstock (1) PBOC (1) PIMCO (1) Pakistan (1) Payment Networks (1) Paypal (1) Pintrest (1) Police (1) Primecoin (1) Princeton (1) Publishing (1) Quark (1) Rap (1) Reddit (1) Ribbit Capital (1) Robbers (1) Robert Faiella (1) Roger Ver (1) Russia (1) Salary (1) Satoshi Nakamoto (1) Sberbank (1) Series B (1) Sigapore (1) Singapore (1) SolarCoin (1) Spanish (1) Staoshi Nakamoto (1) Statistics (1) Subway (1) Sweden (1) Switzerland (1) Tesla (1) The D (1) Transaction (1) TurboTax (1) USB (1) Union Square Ventures (1) VC (1) Velocity (1) VisualCapitalist (1) Volatility (1) Western Union (1) What to Buy WIth Bitcoin? (1) Windows (1) Zanga (1) cagecoin (1) cionye (1) democracy (1) enviornment (1) fiat (1) kanye (1) voting (1)